On this episode of Motley Idiot Cash, Motley Idiot contributors Jon Quast, Rachel Warren, and Jason Corridor talk about:
-
Goldman Sach’s Q1 2026 monetary report.
-
Financial developments to look at throughout earnings season.
-
The impacts from new U.S. blockades.
-
A listener query about SpaceX and main inventory indexes.
To catch full episodes of all The Motley Idiot’s free podcasts, try our podcast heart. Whenever you’re prepared to take a position, try this high 10 listing of shares to purchase.
Will AI create the world’s first trillionaire? Our workforce simply launched a report on the one little-known firm, referred to as an “Indispensable Monopoly” offering the essential know-how Nvidia and Intel each want. Proceed »
A full transcript is beneath.
Before you purchase inventory in Goldman Sachs Group, contemplate this:
The Motley Idiot Inventory Advisor analyst workforce simply recognized what they imagine are the 10 greatest shares for traders to purchase now… and Goldman Sachs Group wasn’t considered one of them. The ten shares that made the reduce may produce monster returns within the coming years.
Take into account when Netflix made this listing on December 17, 2004… in the event you invested $1,000 on the time of our advice, you’d have $524,786!* Or when Nvidia made this listing on April 15, 2005… in the event you invested $1,000 on the time of our advice, you’d have $1,236,406!*
Now, it’s price noting Inventory Advisor’s complete common return is 994% — a market-crushing outperformance in comparison with 199% for the S&P 500. Do not miss the most recent high 10 listing, out there with Inventory Advisor, and be part of an investing neighborhood constructed by particular person traders for particular person traders.
*Inventory Advisor returns as of April 18, 2026.
This podcast was recorded on April 13, 2026.
Jon Quast: It is the beginning of incomes season, and Goldman Sachs is kicking us off. You are listening to Motley Idiot Cash. Welcome to Motley Idiot Cash with the Hidden Gems workforce. I am Jon Quast, and I am joined right now by Idiot contributors Rachel Warren and particular visitor Jason Corridor right now. Thanks all for being with us.
Look, we will get proper to our first story right here, and that’s the funding financial institution Goldman Sachs simply reported monetary outcomes. I simply wish to, for context, put on the market that each three months, publicly traded firms report their monetary outcomes to traders. Often these reviews concentrated all in a couple of weeks of a timespan. That is what we name earnings season. It isn’t required, however it’s simply the way it occurs. There’s at all times banking firms that kick us off. Funding Financial institution Goldman Sachs is actually the primary one out of the gate with first quarter of 2026 outcomes right here this morning, Rachel, let’s speak concerning the numbers. What are simply a few numbers right here that traders needs to be ?
Rachel Warren: I’d say it was a reasonably sturdy begin to earnings season. Goldman Sachs reported quarter web revenues of 17.2 billion. That was up 14%. 12 months over yr, it was higher than what Wall Road had been guiding for earnings got here in about 5.6 billion. The massive takeaway, I believe, for traders, is actually how a lot they earned per share. $17.55. That beat Wall Road’s anticipated $16.49. It is also helped push the return on fairness to 19.8%. The enterprise is being run very effectively proper now. Different quantity that caught out to me Goldman’s Asset and Wealth Administration Unit introduced in 4.08 billion this quarter. That was a strong 10% improve from final yr. It missed Wall Road’s targets barely. Mainly, what this implies is that they earned extra in administration charges as a result of the whole property they oversaw grew, however these good points had been dragged down by a dip in income from their non-public banking enterprise.
Jon Quast: Another issues that had been within the Goldman Sachs report right here, and I wish to flip this to Jason. I did discover that fastened revenue, currencies, commodities, or FICC income, that was truly down 10%. However then, on the opposite aspect, we see that fairness’s income is up 27%. For an individual equivalent to myself, possibly someone on the market listening who does not actually observe banks all that a lot, does not actually observe Goldman Sachs all that a lot, seeing one a part of the enterprise up, one half down, are there any high-level takeaways that we will have there and something that we should always know concerning the financial system from?
Jason Corridor: First with Goldman particularly, it is completely different than Financial institution of America. Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, loads of these different banks. Now, JPMorgan Chase and Financial institution of America have big funding banks, however they’re a part of their common financial institution profile, the place additionally they have the industrial financial institution, which is like, that is what we as simply common people consider as a financial institution. Like, it is the place we hold our cash. It is the place we write checks or pay our debit from. It is the place we go to get loans, that type of factor.
Funding banking is a special animal. They do a lot of issues. The factor you had been speaking about with FICC after which with equities that we’ll discuss, too, that is buying and selling, mainly, and Goldman has a giant position as a market maker, and that is the intermediation a part of the enterprise for buying and selling, fastened revenue property like bonds, foreign money buying and selling, commodities, like oil and gasoline futures, that factor. Then we’ll discuss it too, they’ve equities enterprise, too, so fairness is shares. They’re the market maker for lots of this. Then additionally they present loads of the liquidity, and that is the financing a part of that. If we return to the primary quarter, two issues had been true. Inventory markets had been at all-time highs. Then we received excessive volatility on the finish with the U.S. struggle in Iran.
Now, for Goldman, bull markets and volatility are actually good for the fairness enterprise. As we get to the top of the quarter, once more, we go from report highs. Markets energetic, a lot of buying and selling quantity. That is good. Then the top of the quarter, you are going to see heaps and plenty of their shoppers are repositioning their portfolios like hedge fund shoppers and completely different funding managers like that, and likewise a lot of volatility with oil. They’re buying and selling desks for commodities. All of the commodities that we will discuss that, undergo the Strait of Hormuz, a lot of motion occurred there, however nonetheless ended up with, like, the commodities bucket, a FICC broadly is loads of different issues. You consider the weak point within the mortgage enterprise, uncertainty with rates of interest? Not that way back, the betting cash was on a few rate of interest cuts this yr. Now, we’re saying the Fed is perhaps elevating charges. If there’s anyone actual takeaway, there’s not, like, a clear, apparent takeaway, it is only a reminder that nothing is working completely on a regular basis.
Jon Quast: As we go forward and begin closing out this dialogue of Goldman Sachs, I simply wish to body this within the context of the kickoff of earnings season. Is there something that you just noticed right here on this report that you just assume shall be a theme within the upcoming earnings season. Rachel, let’s begin with.
Rachel Warren: I believe there’s a couple of key large image themes from Goldman’s administration which may echo throughout the road this month. I believe that begins with the resurgence of the capital markets. I imply, CEO David Solomon has very particularly highlighted the agency’s main position in what we’re seeing is a really cyclical rebound for advisory and fairness underwriting. You’ve got received a really high-profile IPO pipeline. You’ve got received names like SpaceX and OpenAI that I believe are capturing loads of investor curiosity proper now. I do assume there is a clear message coming via, which is that this very long-awaited return to regular for world deal making is seemingly upon us. That might present a large tail companies with heavy funding making publicity, in fact, like Goldman Sachs. However there’s loads of headwinds out there proper now. I believe we are going to know much more as we get later into the yr.
Jon Quast: Jason, how about you?
Jason Corridor: I discussed that Goldman’s, it isn’t just like the industrial banks are common banks on the market. In loads of methods, that makes its relationships as a result of it tends to be extra concentrated in its clients, much more necessary. I anticipate that we will hear David Solomon and his workforce, they’re actually going to lean on these deep relationships together with his shoppers. The monitor report of outcomes that it is delivered backs up the depth of these relationships. It is exactly for the uncertainty that we’re navigating proper now. I imply, it is broad, whether or not it is issues like performing as a market maker, serving to finance buying and selling exercise throughout any property, aiding with mergers and acquisitions, wealth administration, and like Rachel was speaking about, serving to finance and ship on these large IPOs, this can be a enterprise that has the sources to ship for its shoppers on no matter its shoppers objectives are.
Now, another factor I wish to observe, it isn’t prefer it’s the industrial banks, however it has a rising mortgage e book. It is price noting that Goldman did improve its credit score loss provisions. I believe that is in all probability extra because of the progress of the mortgage e book than any considerations about credit score high quality, however it’s very a lot price watching. Broadly, as we begin listening to from the Wells and the BOAs and the JPMorgan Chases on the market, what’s credit score high quality wanting like? That is a factor that can provide us an concept how the patron’s doing.
Jon Quast: We’ll positively control that then as the opposite banks begin reporting in upcoming weeks. After the break, we will have a look at a few of the newest developments within the Strait of Hormuz. You are listening to Motley Idiot Cash.
ADVERTISEMENT: Speaker 1: In January of 1915, Ernest Shackleton’s ship Endurance turned encased within the ice within the Weddle Sea. By willpower, grit, and savvy, Shackleton would lead his males via a brutal winter, then over a whole lot of miles of Antarctic ice, adopted by 800 miles throughout a few of the roughest waters on the earth. It is likely one of the most extraordinary and inspirational journeys within the historical past of exploration. Discover this story and lots of others on the Explorers Podcast out there wherever you get your podcast or at explpodcast.com.
Jon Quast: Welcome again to Motley Idiot Cash with the Hidden Gems workforce. We aren’t a workforce of geopolitical consultants on this present by any stretch of the creativeness, however we do wish to acknowledge what is going on within the Iran battle. Over the weekend, talks between the US and Iran in Pakistan broke down. Nothing actually got here of it. Now we’re listening to that the US intends to dam Iranian ports within the Strait of Hormuz, and by the point you are listening to this, it might have already began. Apart from the apparent instability of the area, there are real-world financial impacts right here, and I believe if I am listening to the present, I simply wish to know what’s the fast influence of this determination from the US? What can I anticipate? Rachel, let’s begin with.
Rachel Warren: I believe there’s a couple of issues to be fascinated by right here. The U.S. Navy is imposing this blockade, as of this morning, there appears to be a specific enforcement mechanism in place for ships which have reportedly paid tolls beforehand to Iran, and it type of stays to be seen what that appears like in observe. GretKrud and WTI had already surged previous $100 a barrel. You’ve got received analysts at companies like Onyx Capital Group wording. We are able to see it go as much as $150 if this standoff continues. It is price noting this is not actually only a paper worth hike. It successfully wipes out practically 1.8 million barrels of every day Iranian provide from a market that is already from a regional shortfall that is estimated round 11 million barrels.
The opposite factor, I believe that is necessary to notice, the Persian Gulf is a main hub for nitrogen-based fertilizers, and that blockade has already brought about costs of components like urea and ammonia to leap by as a lot as 50%. Effectively, why does that matter? Urea and ammonia are the lifeblood of recent farming, in order that they’re main components in nitrogen-based fertilizers. With out them, crop yields can drop considerably. That is why we’re seeing some grocery provide emergencies. When the Strait of Hormuz is blocked, the stream of those chemical substances stops, after which the price of rising every little thing from corn to wheat spikes virtually immediately. That is the long-term view of what we may proceed to see if this us.
Jason Corridor: We take into consideration the Center East, we take into consideration oil, and to a lesser extent, we take into consideration pure gasoline, and we take into consideration transportation fuels, electrical energy manufacturing, heating, and that factor. However what we do not usually take into consideration simply as common individuals on the road is the large infrastructure in petrochemical manufacturing that is occurred in these markets. As a substitute of simply transport oil someplace else, after which that place will get to make value-added, higher-margin merchandise, there is a huge quantity of that that now takes place within the Center East. That is precisely what Rachel is speaking about. It extends even past that.
I wish to discuss a few of these alternatives. There’s a actual human toll that is taking place right here, and we’re not ignoring that. I wish to actually be clear about that for individuals listening, however this can be a present about investing, and we’re specializing in the investing side of it right here. On the threat of sounding like a heartless capitalist, we do see the Strait stay restricted in stream, as a result of that is one other necessary a part of this. The U.S. Navy will not be blockading the Strait. They’re blockading Iranian ports to be very particular about what’s taking place. If we do see a restricted stream proceed for an prolonged interval, firms like Cheniere Power could possibly be beneficiaries, different LNG exporters in North America, and likewise locations like Australia which have massive pure gasoline sources.
Rachel, you had been naming off loads of these feedstocks. This is the factor. The truth is that costs are more likely to be larger for these items. World transport markets will adapt to the place the provision is situated. That implies that that could possibly be helpful for firms like Shiner and others. Now, the opposite factor, too, I believe possibly one of many lengthy tail impacts is we may see home vitality prices begin to transfer larger if we do see extra pure gasoline go away the U.S. as a result of typically, it is similar to a regionally traded commodity that the worth goes up and down primarily based on climate. Like when it is actually chilly, the costs go up. When it is actually scorching, the costs go up due to the vitality calls for. However we’re beginning to see, just like the fingers of macro world coverage begin to have an effect on gasoline costs.
Jon Quast: What we’re speaking about proper now’s the fast influence of what this determination from the U.S. may imply. However let’s lengthen our time horizon only a bit as a result of we’re a long-term investing group, and we wish to have that long-term perspective at all times. Let’s simply lengthen the timeline right here. I imply, what occurs if this continues to pull on, or what will occur now that the choice is made?
Rachel Warren: I believe if it drags on, the fast threat is that you just see type of this momentary disaster change into a everlasting a part of our price of dwelling. A few of these price inputs, even when it had been all to reverse now, we is perhaps seeing via the top of this yr. However you consider the worldwide financial system like a large modify in time conveyor belt. When the Strait of Hormuz, which is clearly a literal choke level for this, is dealing with blockades, extra particularly within the Iranian ports, that belt stops. Delivery firms are compelled to take the good distance across the tip of Africa. That provides weeks to journey time. There’s clearly huge gasoline prices. These billions in additional bills do not simply disappear. They inevitably usually get handed all the way down to customers and the worth of vehicles, computer systems, family home equipment. The listing goes on. Over time, there could possibly be this example the place we’re cease speaking a couple of worth spike and extra a couple of world manufacturing stall the place factories would possibly battle to get the uncooked supplies they want after they want them. I believe that also stays to be seen.
Jason Corridor: Jon, there’s a lot of the main target proper now on what occurs in weeks to months out. However I believe we’re already in a state of affairs the place world commodities flows are going to be disrupted to a point for years. There are reviews of great infrastructure injury in Qatar, for instance, and in components of Iran and Qatar which might be throughout a few of the identical areas. We’re at some extent now the place we may see escalation of army motion once more. If that occurs, these arduous property that produce, retailer, and transfer vitality out of this a part of the world, they took a long time to construct. It may take years and billions of {dollars} to restore them. That ties loads to what Rachel was saying.
However I believe the factor that I am actually most about as an investor, searching sooner or later is there are at all times, I imply, the legislation of unintended penalties is an actual factor. I am actually curious, What’s the factor that occurs on account of this struggle that none of us predicted and even actually anticipated? My deepest hope, guys, is that it is one thing disruptive and constructive for humanity.
Jon Quast: It jogs my memory of Morgan Housel. The long run is shocking, and I believe that there is loads of issues that we’re simply not considering of right now, and that is simply the way it works. After the break, we’re attending to our mailbag. You are listening to Motley Idiot Cash.
Welcome again to Motley Idiot Cash with the Hidden Gems workforce. We wish to make you part of our dialog right here. You probably have a inventory or an investing query for Jason, Rachel, myself, or anybody else on the present, you possibly can electronic mail us at podcast at idiot.com. We’d like to have mailbag segments like this every time attainable. Ship in your questions. Bear in mind to maintain them Silly, please. However that electronic mail once more is podcast at idiot.com, podcast at idiot.com.
On that observe, we’re closing right now’s present with a query from you, our listeners. This one comes from Garrett Campbell. He writes, hey. I’ve heard that the S&P 500 is contemplating a rule change to permit SpaceX to affix with out assembly the normal necessities. I am not educated on the IPO course of, how shares change into public, and who owns shares. Are you able to talk about the professionals and cons with granting an exception and permitting SpaceX to affix the S&P 500 as soon as it is public? Thanks, Garrett.
There’s truly a few issues right here in Garrett’s query. First, I assumed that possibly we’d simply communicate shortly to the IPO course of. Garrett saying does not actually know the way the foundations work right here. Jason, are you able to simply stroll us via the IPO course of and discuss mainly whose shares traders are shopping for when it comes public?
Jason Corridor: Jon, asking me to debate something shortly is a problem in and of itself, however I am going to do my greatest, so the IPO course of, an organization and its funding financial institution companions, they go round and meet with potential IPO traders and underwriters. That is the establishments which might be truly shopping for the shares within the IPO. You hear, they are going to set a worth. Then that IPO worth is the worth that these consumers and the underwriters are paying. On the whole, when an organization IPOs, the corporate goes to subject new shares for the IPO. They’re diluting the inner traders. They’re creating these new shares that the IPO traders, the underwriters purchase minus a charge, in fact, to the banking companions. The corporate will get the proceeds. This is not at all times the case. The corporate we’re speaking about that want to go public now, that will be the case. They might be getting the proceeds, however it’s not at all times the case.
Typically we see an organization that is a part of a non-public fairness enterprise that will get IPOs. Quite a lot of occasions, when that firm IPOs the proceeds, they go to the PE agency. The PE agency is promoting a part of its stake. The corporate does not get any extra liquidity. It is simply going public. That is an necessary factor to recollect. Typically you even have some insiders when accompany IPOs which might be additionally promoting into the IPO. It isn’t at all times typically the case, however generally that is a part of it. Often, you see insiders which have a lockup interval that they cannot truly promote for months, months, and months after the very fact. That is roughly the way in which it really works.
Now, this is the factor. That is who’s shopping for the IPO. As retail traders, we’re not shopping for from the corporate. When the inventory debuts available on the market and begins buying and selling on the NASDAQ and New York Inventory Alternate, we’re shopping for shares from these underwriters. We’re shopping for from the folks that purchased the IPO.
Jon Quast: I believe that is such an necessary clarification there, Jason, that the IPO shares have already been offered at regardless of the IPO worth was. Then once we see that large pop on the preliminary buying and selling, that is as a result of a few of these individuals who did purchase are promoting proper then and there to the people who find themselves now retail traders available on the market. Let’s get to the principle half now of Garrett’s query. Mainly, the rumor is that the S&P 500 contemplating tweaking the foundations for House I simply wish to level out right here earlier than we go any additional, that is unconfirmed. That is simply conjecture. It is a rumor at this level, so we do not wish to deal with it as if that is gospel reality at this level. However I do wish to communicate to the query. Mainly, Rachel, if the indexes are literally considering of adjusting the foundations right here to incorporate House X inventory early, which guidelines have they got to vary right here for this to occur?
Rachel Warren: The reporting is that the S&P 500 would change its guidelines for SpaceX That is an energetic proposal reportedly. It isn’t a finished deal. You realize, proper now, an organization needs to be public for a full yr, present 4 straight quarters of revenue earlier than it may even be thought-about for the index. SpaceX, the IPO is predicted to be historic, huge. Reportedly, that is the explanation that S&P Dow Jones Indices is formally asking traders if they need to ditch that one-year seasoning interval, if you’ll, for large firms. Reporting is that they need the index to mirror the precise market fast reasonably than ready till 2027, presuming the IPO happens this yr to incorporate what can be anticipated to be one of many world’s Most worthy companies.
Now, it is truly fascinating as a result of NASDAQ truly simply authorised a brand new quick entry rule beginning Could 1st of this yr. It permits a mega firm to affix the NASDAQ-100 simply 15 days after its IPO. If we noticed the S&P Dow Jones indices observe go well with, it will be a giant shift in how they’ve operated for many years. I believe the objective is to verify billions of {dollars} that will be sitting in passive index funds can begin shopping for the inventory straight away. However we should see how this bears out.
Jon Quast: Hypothetically, as an example that S&P World did change the foundations right here. Is there any profit right here, Jason, for the marketplace for traders?
Jason Corridor: Rachel, I truly agree on the draw back, so I will let her take that. However I do assume there’s some upside. There’s a few components of it. To begin with, I believe it is extra that the indices are beginning to acknowledge the necessity to at the very least contemplate evolving with how the marketplace for IPOs has modified. We will see increasingly more firms. We have already seen it occur the place firms are staying non-public for much longer. Which means they’re getting a lot bigger. Which means they’re getting extra steady. I believe that implies that if we see an organization go public that will usually would qualify for the S&P massive sufficient, but in addition 4 straight quarters of profitability and a transparent path of remaining worthwhile, then it does make sense for it to get included just a little bit earlier.
Now, what concerning the NASDAQ-100 factor? That wasn’t the query, however I will reply it anyway. I do assume that there is could also be motive to be just a little extra leery about that as a result of there is no necessities round profitability for NASDAQ-100 firms. You probably have a large AI startup like Anthropic that is nonetheless burning a lot of cash, go public and get pulled in, there’s definitely extra threat for traders in that state of affairs. That is one other present. Like I mentioned, our listener wasn’t asking about that one.
Jon Quast: Are you mainly saying it’d make a serious index extra risky?
Jason Corridor: I believe so. It is the NASDAQ-100 is already extra risky. Let’s throw open AI in there, too. What do you say? SpaceX. Let’s throw about I do not know, $2.5 trillion price of market cap.
Jon Quast: That might definitely be fascinating. However, Rachel, you are the one who’s going to speak to the draw back right here. What can be the draw back of adjusting the foundations?
Rachel Warren: I am coming in with the unfavourable angle right here. Look, I do assume that there are some downsides to contemplate. I believe the most important what’s that altering these guidelines does create the danger of market distortion. Traditionally talking, that one-year ready interval, it acts as a cooling-off part. Permits the market to discover a steady worth for a brand new inventory after that preliminary IPO hype fades. Definitely, that has been a development we have seen with loads of these imprecise tech firms which have gone public. By waiving this rule, index suppliers would very possible drive tens of billions of {dollars} in passive funds to purchase SpaceX shares virtually instantly. That might huge doubtlessly synthetic surge in demand that would go away the inventory at an unsustainable nosebleed valuation.
That might additionally present assured high-priced exits for early insiders, and on a regular basis retail traders could possibly be extra weak if the worth had been to then have an inevitable crash as soon as that preliminary shopping for frenzy ends. Clearly, that is the worst-case situation there, however I do assume it is necessary to contemplate and concentrate on each side of this equation if, in actual fact, we do see these guidelines change. I believe for now, it is extra of a wait and see.
Jason Corridor: I believe that is proper. I am going to simply add one factor as a meals for thought. For instance SpaceX goes public so massive that it is 5% of the S&P 500. For instance that occurs, and it falls by 50% within the first yr. That is solely a 2.5% haircut for traders in these indices. It isn’t nothing, however it’s additionally not the top of the world.
Jon Quast: Effectively, both means, we’re going to stay up for the SpaceX IPO with nice anticipation. Garrett, thanks a lot for the query, and to the fools on the market listening, we hope that you just get extra questions like that in future episodes. That is all we’ve got time for right now.
As at all times, individuals on this system might have curiosity within the shares they discuss, and The Motley Idiot might have formal suggestions for or in opposition to, so do not buy or promote shares primarily based solely on what you hear. All private finance content material follows Motley Idiot editorial requirements and isn’t authorised by advertisers. Ads are sponsored content material and offered for informational functions solely. To see our full promoting disclosure, please try our present notes. Due to our producer, Bart Shannon, and the remainder of The Motley Idiot workforce. For Jason Corridor, Rachel Warren, and myself, thanks a lot for taking time to hearken to our present right now, and we’ll see you within the subsequent episode.
JPMorgan Chase is an promoting companion of Motley Idiot Cash. Financial institution of America is an promoting companion of Motley Idiot Cash. Wells Fargo is an promoting companion of Motley Idiot Cash. Jason Corridor has no place in any of the shares talked about. Jon Quast has no place in any of the shares talked about. Rachel Warren has no place in any of the shares talked about. The Motley Idiot has positions in and recommends Cheniere Power, Goldman Sachs Group, and JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Idiot has a disclosure coverage.
Goldman Sachs Kicks Off Earnings Season was initially revealed by The Motley Idiot
