President Donald Trump indicators an government order within the Oval Workplace on the White Home on September 19, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Andrew Harnik | Getty Photographs
A coalition of unions, employers and spiritual teams filed a lawsuit on Friday looking for to dam President Donald Trump’s bid to impose a $100,000 payment on new H-1B visas for highly-skilled overseas employees.
The lawsuit filed in federal court docket in San Francisco is the primary to problem a proclamation Trump issued two weeks in the past saying the payment because the Republican president strikes to additional prohibit immigration to the US.
Plaintiffs embody the United Auto Employees union, the American Affiliation of College Professors, a nurse recruitment company and several other spiritual organizations. They argued that Trump’s energy to limit the entry of sure overseas nationals doesn’t permit him to override the legislation that created the H-1B visa program.
White Home spokeswoman Abigail Jackson in an announcement mentioned Trump’s administration engaged in lawful actions “discouraging corporations from spamming the system and driving down American wages, whereas offering certainty to employers who have to convey the very best expertise from abroad.”
This system permits U.S. employers to rent overseas employees in specialty fields, and know-how corporations particularly rely closely on employees who obtain H-1B visas.
Critics of H-1Bs and different work visa applications say they’re usually used to exchange American employees with cheaper overseas labor. However enterprise teams and main corporations have mentioned H-1Bs are a essential means to deal with a scarcity of certified American employees.
Employers who sponsor H-1B employees at present usually pay between $2,000 and $5,000 in charges, relying on the scale of the corporate and different elements.
Trump’s order bars new H-1B recipients from getting into the US until the employer sponsoring their visa has made a further $100,000 fee. The administration has mentioned the order doesn’t apply to individuals who already maintain H-1B visas or those that submitted purposes earlier than September 21.
Trump in his unprecedented order invoked his energy beneath federal immigration legislation to limit the entry of sure overseas nationals that may be detrimental to the pursuits of the US.
He mentioned that prime numbers of lower-wage employees within the H-1B program have undercut its integrity and that this system threatens nationwide safety, together with by discouraging Individuals from pursuing careers in science and know-how. He mentioned the “large-scale alternative of American employees” by means of the H-1B program threatens the nation’s financial and nationwide safety.
The plaintiffs argue that Trump has no authority to change a complete statutory scheme governing the visa program and can’t beneath the U.S. Structure unilaterally impose charges, taxes or different mechanisms to generate income for the US, saying that energy is reserved for Congress.
“The Proclamation transforms the H-1B program into one the place employers should both ‘pay to play’ or search a ‘nationwide curiosity’ exemption, which can be doled out on the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Safety, a system that opens the door to selective enforcement and corruption,” the lawsuit mentioned.
The teams argue that companies, together with the U.S. Division of Homeland Safety’s U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Companies and U.S. State Division likewise adopted new insurance policies to implement Trump’s proclamation with out following crucial rulemaking processes and with out contemplating how “extorting exorbitant charges will stifle innovation.”
The H-1B program gives 65,000 visas yearly to employers bringing in non permanent overseas employees in specialised fields, with one other 20,000 visas for employees with superior levels. The visas are permitted for a interval of three to 6 years.
India was by far the most important beneficiary of H-1B visas final yr, accounting for 71% of permitted visas, whereas China was a distant second at 11.7%, based on authorities knowledge.
